The model of this class and its relation to these new news models
ScotusBlog
Texas Trib. (And Ct Mirror, the New Haven Independent, and some words about self-limitation and partnership. And the issue of slack.)
Homicide Watch DC.
Digital First.
Traffic whoring -- pros and cons.
Charisma -- Andrew Sullivan.
The Who is Responsible Question.
Get off the Bus. Pro-Am journalism.
Narrative Science -- robots will replace us.
Leverage vs. the McMahon campaign
If journalism is, at its root, designed to provide the public with the information it needs to be self-governing, and if part of that information is the insight that emerges from the aggressive and often hostile monitoring of a variety of social institutions, why would anyone in power ever talk to a journalist? Why would the subjects of monitorial scrutiny not simply communicate with each other and with the public directly, avoiding all dealings with news reporters? In part, for self-interested reasons: government officials and other powerful people know that talking to the press is always an opportunity, however limited, to ‘get your side of the story out,’ even if the results will ultimately be damning. In part, however, officials engage with the press because these officials fear the consequences of non-response.